McGahan and Porter
How much does industry matter really? Anita McGahan and Michael Porter
Abstract: In this paper, we examine the importance of year, industry, corporate-parent, and business specific effects on the profitability of U.S. public corporations within
specific 4-digit SIC categories. Our results indicate that year, industry, corporate-parent, and business-specific effects account for 2 percent, 19 percent, 4 percent, and 32 percent, respectively, of the aggregate variance in profitability. We also find that the importance of the effects differs substantially across broad economic sectors. Industry effects account for a smaller portion of profit variance in manufacturing but a larger portion in
lodging/entertainment, services, wholesale/retail trade, and transportation. Across all sectors we find a negative covariance between corporate-parent and industry effects. A detailed analysis suggests that industry, corporate-parent, and business-specific effects are related in complex ways.
Introduction
Debate in strategy has long focused on the sources of performance differences among firms. In the research growing out of the industrial organization tradition, industry structure is a central determinant of firm performance, and firm differences are
considered against an industry background. More recently a line of though sometimes called the resource based view argues that firm performance is most influenced by unique organizational processes. Under this view industry structure is less important then idiosyncratic historical factors giving rise to firm differences.
Data
Recently compiled data from the Compustat Business Segment Reports for 1981 -1994. This dataset covers activity in all sectors of the American economy.
Empirical results
Variation in profits
- 2% of variance in profits is associated with year effects. The effects are
macroeconomic fluctuations that affect all business segments to the same degree in a particular year
- 19% of variance is attributable to stable industry effects. This result provides
strong support for the idea that industry membership has an important influence on profitability. The estimate is much higher than Rumelt’s stable industry effect (8.32%) and is comparable with Schmalensee result (19.59%)
- Stable effects of corporate-parent membership account for nearly 4% of the
variance in business segment profit.
- Stable segment-specific effects account for nearly 32% of the variance.
Variation in importance of industry effects
McGahan and Porter week ... 暂无评价 2页 1财富值 summary week 1 暂无评价 5页 免费 week 4-1 暂无评价 8页 1财富值 1 2 3 4 5 Summary 暂无评价...
2.00元 McGahan and Porter week ... 暂无评价 2页 1财富值 summary week ...4 1995 March 28 ssess the success or failure of each of the missions: ...
4-25-Week 1 summary 0424 7页 2财富值 4-25-Week 1 summary 0424 暂无评价...McGahan and Porter week ... 暂无评价 2页 1财富值 Week 2 UN Interventio...
McGahan and Porter week ... 暂无评价 2页 1财富值 egitimacy as a capital m... 8页 免费 Improving service qualit... 5页 5财富值 Strategy making ...
Response to McGahan and Porter's commentary on Industry, corporate and business...corporate, and industry (Rue?i and Wiggins, 2003; Tables 2, 3 and 4)...
Response to McGahan and Porter's commentary on Industry, corporate and business...corporate, and industry (Rue?i and Wiggins, 2003; Tables 2, 3 and 4)...

我要评论